Self’s Assisted Treatment: Diagnosis or discernment (3rd Divine Principle)
Diagnosis or discernment, and treatment in the case of Adam and Eve
In the divine will and plan and the scientific discourse, Adam and Eve informed about the human health, life, and medicine differently from the discourse found in religions and modern quantitative science. Reading in the Bible, they allowed a qualitative scientist to perceive the divine principles and informed freedom (coded as DPIF) opposed to the evil principles and informed freedom (coded as EPIF) of given alienation of the evil pretense in human health, life, and medicine economy (coded as HLME).... To read the entire introduction click here..
Divine Principles
Learned in the Bible, for healthy being in qualitative life, the divine principles are the original principles for the hygiene in human health, life, and medicine economy. Now, in given situation of life, helped in the modern science progress, it is given to mature in the religious approach of the case of Adam and Eve to better the human health, life, and medicine economy (coded as HLME) inherited from given context of life.... To read more about this introduction click here
1. A motivational knowledge information (coded as MKI)
2. A good intended initiative (coded as GII)
3. Conscientious probing interview question-answers (coded as CPIQ) as a phenomenon are a fundamental tool of God’s helping relationship with his privileged human beings compared with the other species in the divine created nurturing ecosystem. As in the Genesis Book of the Bible (coded as GBB), the conscientious probing interview question-answers allowed the self’s in-depth reflection to bring forth into the conscience or conscientiousness the content of both the inconscience or unconsciousness and the subconscience. In the case of the first human beings (coded as FHB) Adam and Eve, the divine questionning revealed and stated the human relationship with him as related to their intended initiatives and the divine motivational knowledge information (coded as DMKI) in the use of their nurturing ecosystem. This divine questionning also was triggered by the human feeling related to this nurturing ecosystem confided to their care. The divine questionning finally revealed the privileged individual situation (coded as PIS) of a human being in the divine creation. Reading differently from religious perspective the encounter test of Adam and Eve with a cunning serpent allowed to qualify this encounter as a specific event of life (coded as SEL) that exposed a given divine will and plan (coded as DWP) at the creation of the human beings to help them discover, achieve, and own their selves made in the divine image after his likeness. This statement was, later, confirmed by the analysis of the dialogue between God and Cain. The dialogue between Eve and the cunning serpent or, later, between God and Cain revealed a given unconscious disharmony of health and life (coded as UDHL) in the first privileged human beings (coded as PHB) in the beginning of the creation. That disharmony and its happening were revealed in the ignorance, neglect, or unconsciousness of the divine omnipresence, will, and plan in his creation. In the dialogue between Eve and the serpent, this unconscious disharmony of health and life was subjected and depended on evil pretense and human temptation to sin; it was shown by their hiding from God and from an unknown. It was brought to the human conscience for treatment and necessitated the divine help. It was also highlighted by God who conducted given probing interview questions (coded as PIQ) at its occurrence in human health psychology (coded as HHP) related to human health, life, and medicine economy (coded as HLME). The divine probing interview questions or concientious probing interview questions (coded as CPIQ) in Adam triggered an answer that accused God and his wife Eve about his unconscious disharmony of health and life made objective by his hiding behavior. Differently from Adam, in Eve, her answer pointed to her deception following her dialogue with the snake. Her deception also became objective after her having eaten the divine forbidden fruit (coded as DFF), as first, she remembered that the plant-related knowledge of good and evil (coded as KGE) was linked to inevitable death as in the divine motivational knowledge information, second, she was feeling fear of death stated in this same divine motivational knowledge information, and, third, she was compelled to hiding from God, because they discovered that they were naked and they felt ashamed about it. As shown in regard to her later reaction, helped by the divine questionning, Eve’s deceit finally led her, first, to experience a discernment approach that the serpent’s motivational knowledge information was evil and the earlier divine motivational knowledge information was good, and, second, at Cain’s birth from her, to make her conscientious and informed choice (coded as CIC) of God that resulted in her to her monologue meditationprayer praise of God and later her giving birth to Abel.
As an assumed analysis in the truth study approach, Adam, Eve,and the cunning snake helped to perceive that, different from divine will and plan, any motivational knowledge information can induce the human self or being to ignore or silence one’s true self or being made in the divine image after the divine likeness. A motivational knowledge information (coded as MKI) can induce the human inherited self or being (coded as HISB) toward becoming an human evil spirit (coded as HES) as an unhealthy phenomenon (coded as UP). In such a case, the motivational knowledge information can be perceived as evil different from good motivational knowledge information (coded as GMKI), because of the causality favoring factors (coded as CFF) that were the evil pretense in the serpent and the temptation of Adam and Eve, which pushed the human sin commitment. In Adam, the human evil spirit seemed to be latent and revealed by the divine probing interview questions (coded as DPIQ). Adam allowed to discern the human evil spirit beneath given evil pretense syndrome (coded as EPS). The human evil spirit due to evil motivational knowledge information (coded as EMKI) was defined as, first, being against God, his instructions in the use of the goods of his nurturing ecosystem (coded as GNE) and the divine economy in humanity and the nurturing ecosystem (coded as NE), and second, refusing the divine will and plan in one’s being and in a given nurturing ecosystem. The evil pretense syndrome discerned in the human self (coded as HS)’s spirit described two perceptive distortions: First, spiritually oriented impact (coded as SOI) that allows the evil attitude formation (coded as EAF), the evil emotional formation (coded as EEF), and the evil behavioral formation (coded as EBF), and, second, biologically oriented impact (coded as BOI) that allows the unconscious disharmony of health and life (coded as UDHL). The unconscious disharmony of health and life was due to given evil pretense syndrome, temptation, sin, and syndrome of death phenomenon (coded as SDP). The evil pretense syndrome was made objective by these irrational symptoms or signs (when explained, discerned or diagnosed): Dreadful terror, confusion, perversion, oppression, obsession, possession, denial, or betrayal. Those symptoms or signs are irrational, because they were uneasily explained by an invisible causality. In the case of Adam and Eve as first human beings directly made by God, the phenomena such as evil pretense, temptation, sin, and death were first conceptual, unknown, and invisible, and second, made intelligible through the words and psychology of God, Adam, Eve, the serpent, and the forbidden fruit that were described visible in the human ordinary understanding (coded as HOU). In God’s first described natural laboratory setting (coded as NLS), following the first time conscientious knowledge of good and evil in Adam and Eve due to the ingestion of the divine forbidden fruit (coded as DFF) of the tree of knowledge of good and evil linked to death, the syndrome of death phenomenon as shown in the first human natural couple (coded as HNC) was the support of the evil pretense syndrome in latent and made perceptible pathological phenomena such as, first, mindset, sin, and wounds (coded as MSW), second, temptation and evil spirits (coded as TES), and third, fear and frustration (coded as FF). Those pathological phenomena described given health psychology as spiritual and behavioral infused science. As a test with the unknown even believed known (See, God and given invisible world), each one of these latent and visible pathological phenomena was also made objective by these rational symptoms or signs (when explained, discerned or diagnosed): Terror, confusion, perversion, oppression, obsession, possession, denial, or betrayal. Following this test, God was the first to make his self as visible and known by, first, making noise (See, the sound of his promenade or step in walking perceived by human sense, conscience or conscientiousness), second, questioning Adam and Eve, and third, chasing the serpent. Acting so, God revealed his invisible divine presence (coded as IDP) and invisible divine acknowledging (coded as IDA) in the nurturing ecosystem. The evil pretense was highlighted in the hiding of Adam and Eve and in the serpent and its suggestion. The death phenomenon was objective in the divine forbidden fruit, later, in latent and invisible pathological phenomena as human causality favoring factors. In a truth studying approach (coded as TSA) for the human health, life, and medicine economy, the divine probing interview questions led to perceive conscientious probing interview question-answers (coded as CPIQ) as tools that carried out the purpose of spiritual care and medicine (coded as SCM) that displayed multiples properties for given diagnosis or discernment, and treatment (coded as DDT) of human inherited being or self (coded as HIBS), given human evil spirit, evil motivational knowledge information, evil pretense syndrome, syndrome of death phenomenon, human good spirit, and good motivational knowledge information.
As a perceptive analysis in the truth study approach, conscientious probing interview question-answers helped the first human beings identify and own their human true being or self as made in the divine image after the divine likeness. In the Genesis Book of the Bible (coded as GBB), conscientious probing interview question-answers (coded as CPIQ) were a divine principle, which helped identify the human true being or self (coded as HTBS) as it pleased God (i.e., according to the divine will and plan [coded as DWP]). It displayed two main properties that were first, spiritually oriented impact (coded as SOI), which allowed the good attitude formation (coded as GAF), the good emotional formation (coded as GEF), and the good behavioral formation (coded as GBF), and second, biologically oriented impact (coded as BOI) that allowed the unconscious harmony of the health and the life (coded as UHHL) as it pleased God. The follow up of the case of Eve allowed to define the conscientious probing interview question-answers as a procedure tool related to given good motivational knowledge information, given human good spirit, healthy dynamics or forces (coded as HDF), human inherited self or being, human true being or self, and self’s healthy dynamics or forces. It helped examine the first human beings’ conscience from their inconscience or unconsciousness through their subconscience with their willingness to experience and retrieve their silent harmony of health and life (coded as SHHL). As a divine principle, conscientious probing interview questioning showed God’s expectation of its effect finality as good, healthy, and betterment in the process of discovering and owning the human true being or self, however given situation and context of life (coded as SCL) or conscientious specific event of life (coded as CSEL). Observed in a given test of life and death (coded as TLD) or test of health and life issues (coded as THLI) such as, first, a conscientious specific event of life as, for example, onset natural universal feelings (coded as ONUF; feelings such as sadness, anguish, dilemma, compassion, desire, fatigue, hunger, thirst, initial inevitable feeling syndrome [coded as IFS: meditation, urge, stress, distress, pain, and suffering], sorrow, and grief), or, second, unsolved health and life questioning (coded as UHLQ) in modern unhealthy dynamics (coded as MUD) and self’s unhealthy dynamics (coded as SUD), two properties of action (See, spiritually oriented impact and biologically oriented impact) in conscientious probing interview question-answers allowed to experience the relief feeling mode (coded as RFM) of given onset natural universal feelings and unsolved health and life questioning in durability and quality. The measure of this relief feeling mode (See, the scale table) was first, the healthy universal feeling (coded as HUF) as peace, joy, wellness, justice, and belief, and second, the human spiritual potential’s expression (coded as HSPE) as faith, hope, love, trust, and freedom.
As a perceptive analysis in the truth study approach, the rationale behind conscientious probing interview question-answers would be that, as a divine principle, following one’s conscientious and informed choice of God and his divine motivational knowledge information, it showed God’s expectation of their effect finality as good, healthy, and betterment in the process of discovering and owning a person’s human true being or self, already made in the divine image after the divine likeness, however given situation and context of life or conscientious specific event of life. Before their temptation, sin, and deceit, the silence of God in his relationship with his privileged human beings was explained by their correspondence to the divine image after God’s likeness. Adam and Eve, those human beings (coded as HB) displayed given obedience to the divine-related natural law of the healthy and happy life, as they complied with living guided by the divine motivational knowledge information (See, Eve’s initial reaction to the cunning serpent). Indeed, God was ignored or omitted and suppressed in Adam’s first verbal expression following the presentation of Eve to him. Eve was another human being made by God in his divine image after his likeness (See, from Adam and the earthly material). Adam made no mention of God in his first expressed verbal words, “This one, at last, is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; this one shall be called ‘woman, for out of man this one has been taken” (Genesis 2:23). As Adam was contented with Eve, the divine gift for his help, and all was apparently alright, God remained silent in his creation. But, God interrupted his silence, when the privileged individual situation of his first human natural couple (coded as HNC) was to shift into an unhealthy phenomenon. God showed his willingness to help the couple perceive, diagnose or discern, prevent, and treat the beginning process of this phenomenon at its root. God made his presence perceived into the couple’s conscience. He prompted Adam’s reaction to his presence by asking him and Eve for answer to probing interview question (coded as PIQ), as related to the motivational knowledge information as he already instructed them in the beginning of their beings. God’s probing interview question in Adam’s answer was to make him diagnose or discern, prevent and treat the latent unhealthy phenomenon. Adam’s answer revealed his longtime latent mindset, his accusation of God for Eve as a causality favoring factor (coded as CFF) of his having sinned, and his sin-related wound. God’s probing interview question in Eve’s answer was to make her diagnose or discern, prevent and treat the latent unhealthy phenomenon. Eve’s answer revealed her made-up mindset, her accusing of the serpent for being a causality favoring factor of her having sinned, and her sin-related wound. Differently from the serpent, God brought Adam and Eve to express their insight as unconsciousness and subconscience, given spiritual infused science (coded as SIS). As the main obvious causality favoring factor of the human original sin (coded as HOS) of his first privileged human beings, God never asked the serpent any question, but, silenced it and predicted to it (i.e., the serpent) its human future treatment, as he already knew its true self as an alienation. God also predicted to his first human natural couple the consequences of their newly acquired knowledge of good and evil due to the forbidden fruit and their own action, interacting with each other and with their nurturing ecosystem. The divine prediction following the divine probing interview question was to help perceive the divine principle in the conscientious probing interview question-answers. Compared to Adam, Eve helped understand the difference between an assumed analysis and a perceptive analysis in the truth study approach (coded as TSA) of the divine will and plan (coded as DWP) in his creation. Adam displayed that he assumed God instead of having appreciated or accepted him as his creator. For, the conscientious probing interview question-answers not only helped the human conscience, but, also explained God’s actions in having created a woman to better help a man for corresponding to the divine image after the divine likeness. Started with Adam as a privileged human being as the first created human of God, it was given to read that a man ignored or challenged God in the presence of a woman to whom he was attracted, according to his quoted word. The biblical stated rationale about the woman was as it follows: “That is why a man leaves his father and mother and clings to his wife, and the two of them become one body. The man and his wife were both naked, yet they felt no shame” (Genesis 2:24-25). While the worldly view was to be as in Adam’s answer to God, the conscientious probing interview question-answers was a spiritual extraordinary mode of observation (coded as EMO) comparable to a current available laboratory macroscopic and microscopic examination (coded as ALMMA), as it helped bring forth into the conscientiousness or conscience of Eve what was in the subconscience and the inconscience or unconsciousness of Adam as well as hers. Eve’s answer to God was different from Adam’s as God also questioned her. Eve’s answer met God’s expectation. Differently from Adam, she already confronted the cunning serpent with the accurate words of God, and also discerned the source of her sin or fault as it was the snake suggestion that infested her mind. She discerned that anything opposing the divine instructions in the use of the nurturing ecosystem (coded as UNE) was the cause of their felt shame as given disharmony of health and life (coded as DHL). She was confirmed by the reaction of God toward the cunning animal: “Because you have done this, I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; they will strike at your head, while you strike at their heel (Genesis 3:14b-15). Although the cunning infested the human spirit in the use of the nurturing ecosystem, compared to his older brother Cain, and as his mother in having recognized God in her monologue meditationprayer praise of God, Abel allowed to acknowledge the divine pleased use of the nurturing ecosystem (coded as DPUNE). To read more, click here...
What about you? (Test yourself:
1. What are your existential situations and contexts of life [coded as ESCL; Note that a context of life can be a setting of life]?
2. How do you feel your “self” [a. Spiritually {i.e., your spirit: intelligence and will; your soul: memory, imagination, and affection}; See, spiritually oriented impact {coded as SOI}];[b. Bodily {i.e., your physic and physiology}; See, biologically oriented impact{coded as BOI}]; and [c. In your context or setting {i.e., family, workplace, neighborhood, or belief structure or system: example church}?
3. How is your stand in the issue of life and death?
4. How do you feel in your lifestyle [a. Spiritual religious or non-religious]; [b. Religious traditional or non-traditional]; [c. Modern religious affiliated or non-religious-affiliated]; and [d. Married conventional or non-conventional; Single religious or non-religious; in union with no commitment]?) Email and send your story wtgfscm@jesus-sat.org
Acknowledging spiritual care and medicine (coded as SCM) allows the qualitative healthy dynamics (coded as QHD) personified by Jesus who harmlessly helps a willing human being (coded as WHB) silently experience the Healthy Happiness and Qualitative Life (coded as HHQL) in the presence and action of the Holy Spirit (coded as PAHS), treating one’s human inherited self or being (coded as HISB) to perceive and own one’s human true self or being (coded as HTSB).
Learn through:Buy our books:WTGF Text Book (Please, help us with your donation (≥$1; ≥$30.00; ≥$80.00) for publishing, which will cost ≥ $ 8,000.00): Title: “Curing through the meditation of the Rosary mysteries: The story of George”“Work into the Triumph of God” with our store $17.00“Health Spirituality” with our store $15.00“Meditation-prayer as a healing complement for human spiritual and physical suffering” with our store
Before leaving this page, allow us to thank you for your visit and time. We still expect your generosity to contribute to our research, because we believe that you are worthy as you want the world around you to be healthier and happier! Smile, feel HEALTHY feel HAPPY!